There has been a minor media storm over the decision of certain cinema chains to withdraw a Church of England advertisement featuring the Lord’s Prayer.
Perhaps they were hoping to avoid controversy by avoiding religion. In reality, of course, religion is unavoidable and they have generated far more controversy than would have been the case if they had gone ahead with the advert.
The decision to refuse the advert is pretty ridiculous, but I’m sorry to see that many of its defenders have responded by insisting that the advert is not offensive. There are two issues that are being overlooked.
Firstly, there is an assumption that adverts generally are not offensive. Personally, I am offended by about ninety percent of adverts. Many of them promote values I don’t believe in, encourage consumerism, champion narrow gender stereotypes and tell me that my life will be better if I buy a load of wasteful junk. I’ve seen army recruitment adverts in cinemas, romanticising war and promoting an organisation rooted in violence and hierarchy.
If you do not share my values, these things may not offend you, but I’m sure some other adverts will. Almost anything that promotes a product or an idea will offend somebody. But I do not have a right not to be offended, and nor do you.
Secondly, the Lord’s Prayer is supposed to be offensive – at least to those who benefit from the status quo. One of its most important lines is, “Your kingdom come”. A prayer that the Kingdom of God will come is implicitly a prayer that the kingdoms and powers of this world will come to an end.
Theologians from Augustine onwards have made tortuous arguments for the idea that Christians can support both the Kingdom of God and the kingdoms they live in. But the Kingdom of God has inherently different values to the idols of money and military might that dominate our world. No-one can serve two masters.
Let’s have a look at the actual content of the Lord’s Prayer. The prayer is attributed in the New Testament to Jesus himself, although it’s likely that only parts of it were said by him and other parts were added by others.
It’s opening words are:
“Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name.”
This may sound fairly innocuous, but in Jesus’ time, the word “father” implied authority over others. Not only was a father seen as in some sense the “owner” of his wife and children, but the Roman Emperor was described as father of the empire. According to the New Testament, Jesus encouraged his followers to “call no-one ‘father’ on earth”. Titles that involve authority belong only to God. This was subversive of both family structures and the emperor.
The prayer continues:
“Your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as in heaven. Give us today our food for the day. Forgive us our debts as we forgive those indebted to us.”
God’s kingdom is an alternative to the kingdoms, nation-states and other powers that we live under. Jesus prayed that God’s will would be done. What does this mean in practice? The next line prays for us to be fed. If God’s will is done, everyone will have enough to eat. Jesus chose this as his first illustration of a world which follows the will of God.
This is followed by a prayer for the cancellation of debts. In some translations, the word is rendered “sins” or “trespasses”. It can refer both to literal financial debts, metaphorical debts and the guilt that comes with sin. It is pretty shocking to call for the cancellation of any or all of these things, and certainly contrary to the values that dominate our world, which insists that debts must be paid.
The prayer goes on:
“Save us form the time of trial and deliver us from evil. For the kingdom, the power and the glory are yours, now and forever. Amen.”
Speaking in a setting in which his followers expected persecution, Jesus prayed that God would save them from the trials and evils that they were likely to expect. He finished with a reminder that the power and glory lies in God’s hands, not anyone else’s (such as the rulers and persecutors of this world).
The Lord’s Prayer is a prayer for the overthrow of all existing social conditions. Of course some people should find it offensive.
My new book, The Upside-Down Bible: What Jesus really said about money, sex and violence, is published this week by Darton, Longman and Todd.
Very good analysis.
I can largely agree with your here, and I have written a blog myself making similar points at http://www.middlewaysociety.org/on-not-saying-amen-to-star-wars/ . The use of ‘debts’ rather than ‘trespasses’, though, however correct on scholarly grounds, does not reflect the version of the prayer used in the advert,
Pingback: Are Christianity and Capitalism Compatible? | From guestwriters
Pingback: ‘Just Pray’ Ad – Banned rightly or wrongly? | Spirituality Ireland
Dear Symon Hill:
Shame on you!
How dare you imply a day of reckoning for our hideous pantheon of demon gods, Consumerism – and with it, Materialism, Wealth, Nationalism, Militarism, Hedonism and the like! How DARE you!
Alternatively, thank you for telling us that Christian existence is of a nature different than this world, however much we remain in this world. I see little in the policy of earthly kingdoms that is not subsumed under War, Famine, Pestilence and Death. I am increasingly convinced that narrative inventions about ubiquitous Terror ‘threats,’ Austerity, Privatization, Security, etc. serve to normalize those iniquitous policies, and to bind us to them in a counter-kingdom of God vision of what we need to exist.
Rather than bowing to these idol-gods, shouldn’t we rather expose them, pray for the release of nations from them, and otherwise exorcise them? What if the reason for which people abandon the Church in droves is that it is now indistinguishable from paganism?
Your little exposition of Jesus’ model prayer to his disciples made me recall Dagon’s collapse before the ark of the covenant of Yahweh [1Sa 5]. Would to God that our cultural idols see the same end!
Thank you for serving Jesus Christ.